Archive for August, 2009
Why Buy One, When Three Is Much Better
Congress buys three gulfstream jets for the US Air Force, even though the Air Force only asked for one. Oh yea, they want them for their personal use:
“Last year, lawmakers excoriated the CEOs of the Big Three automakers for traveling to Washington, D.C., by private jet to attend a hearing about a possible bailout of their companies,” Roll Call reports.
“But apparently Congress is not philosophically averse to private air travel: At the end of July, the House approved nearly $200 million for the Air Force to buy three elite Gulfstream jets for ferrying top government officials and Members of Congress.”
The Air Force had asked for one jet as part of an upgrade program, but the House Appropriations Committee added two more at its own discretion.
Change we can believe in

An open letter to Democrats on Health care reform
Be honest.
At some point, the GOP will regain control of Washington.
Do you really trust the GOP with your health information?
Do you trust the next G. Gordon Liddy with your data?
Do you trust the next Karl Rove not to move the medical appointments of registered Democrats to Election Day, as a means of suppressing their votes?
Think about it.
Lets Rethink the Healthcare Issue
It might not be as bad as you think. The US system that is. Here are a few examples:
1. Americans have better survival rates than Europeans for common cancers. Breast cancer mortality is 52 percent higher in Germany than in the United States and 88 percent higher in the United Kingdom. Prostate cancer mortality is 604 percent higher in the United Kingdom and 457 percent higher in Norway. The mortality rate for colorectal cancer among British men and women is about 40 percent higher.
2. Americans have lower cancer mortality rates than Canadians. Breast cancer mortality in Canada is 9 percent higher than in the United States, prostate cancer is 184 percent higher, and colon cancer among men is about 10 percent higher.
3. Americans have better access to treatment for chronic diseases than patients in other developed countries. Some 56 percent of Americans who could benefit from statin drugs, which reduce cholesterol and protect against heart disease, are taking them. By comparison, of those patients who could benefit from these drugs, only 36 percent of the Dutch, 29 percent of the Swiss, 26 percent of Germans, 23 percent of Britons, and 17 percent of Italians receive them.
Health Care for Everyone But You and I
We seem to be more worried about 2% of the US Population versus the 98% that has coverage, doesn’t want coverage, or simply doesn’t deserve it (without paying on their own). More from Karl Rove:
Mr. Obama’s problem is that nine out of 10 Americans would likely get worse health care if ObamaCare goes through. Of those who do not have insurance—and who therefore might be better off—approximately one-fifth are illegal aliens, nearly three-fifths make $50,000 or more a year and can afford insurance, and just under a third are probably eligible for Medicaid or other government programs already.
For the slice of the uninsured that is left—perhaps about 2% of all American citizens—Team Obama would dismantle the world’s greatest health-care system. That’s a losing proposition, which is why Mr. Obama is increasingly resorting to fear and misleading claims. It’s all the candidate of hope has left.
Too Big To Pass
A novel concept we can fully get behind:
So I would propose a simple, bright-line rule. In recent months many observers have said that if a company is too big to fail (i.e., in a pinch the government will bail it out), then it is too big to exist. I think there is a lot of merit to that idea. Here is my corollary: if a bill is too vast for a Congressman to read and understand, it is too big to pass. If a Congressman can’t read the bill, he shouldn’t vote for it. The appropriate response to any such legislation is: just vote “No.”
The American Public Realizes (now) that Obama Simply Isn’t a Centrist
With poll after poll coming out showing the disconnect between Obama’s leftist approach to governing and the moderate nature of the American public, their is definitely going to be some fallout.
Via Rasmussen:
Seventy-six percent (76%) of U.S. voters now think President Obama is at least somewhat liberal. Forty-eight percent (48%) say he is very liberal, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. This marks the highest finding to date on the question and is a five-point increase in the number who say the president is very liberal from a month ago. … Seventeen percent (17%) of voters say the president is moderate, while only six percent (6%) believe he is conservative.
Jennifer Rubin of Pajamas Media has an excellent piece on Obama’s loss in the polls and his massive lurch to the Left. Not that he wasn’t there already, but that he simply convinced Americans that he was a Moderate.